What is our duty as an American? Do we have any sense of responsibility for the future of our country or the inheritance that we are going to leave for our children? Will our children enjoy the same freedoms we were so privileged to enjoy because of the selfless giving of those who proceeded us? This is a call to arms...engage yourself to this cause, while we still have freedom to protect!
Psalms 11:3 If the foundations be destroyed, What can the righteous do?
Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Friday, March 22, 2013
Saying "I'm Sorry"
I have had this same discussion many times recently and so it was good to see Bill O'Reilly address this topic on his "Tip of the Day" segment this week.
There is a difference between saying you are sorry and making amends or restitution. Seems many in our culture today don't understand the "rules" of an apology. Saying you are sorry is a good place to start, don't get me wrong, but it doesn't DO anything to fix the relationship or the matter.
When we break something, we should FIX it. Didn't you hear that as a kid growing up? Well, maybe not as many today have not been taught manners but that is a topic for another day. The right thing to do, even though many in this culture have lost this art of civility, is to go to a person, say you were wrong and then ask what you can do to repair the damage you have caused. It's what makes the world go round in a peaceful way...love! If you love someone, you would do to them as you would want them to do to you. Wouldn't you want someone to treat you with this kind of love? Then you must DO this kind of love too! If you offend someone, you should make it right, not just say, "I'm sorry" but find out what they need from you to repair the damage you have caused.
This is seen everyday in our world we live in when we file an insurance claim for an "accident'. When someone hits your car, there is a process that unfolds to repair the damage. We have insurance to cover our mistakes when driving. Well, the same thing should be true for our actions in life. When we cause a "foul" there should be an exchange, a payment, a repair to make it right.
Actions ALWAYS speak louder than words and in this case, if you apologize to someone, you also must be willing to MAKE it right by doing something. Words are cheap! What a wonderful world this would be if people would just OWN UP on what they have done. We ALL fail. We ALL need to be able to own it, address it, confess it and repair it.
There is a difference between saying you are sorry and making amends or restitution. Seems many in our culture today don't understand the "rules" of an apology. Saying you are sorry is a good place to start, don't get me wrong, but it doesn't DO anything to fix the relationship or the matter.
When we break something, we should FIX it. Didn't you hear that as a kid growing up? Well, maybe not as many today have not been taught manners but that is a topic for another day. The right thing to do, even though many in this culture have lost this art of civility, is to go to a person, say you were wrong and then ask what you can do to repair the damage you have caused. It's what makes the world go round in a peaceful way...love! If you love someone, you would do to them as you would want them to do to you. Wouldn't you want someone to treat you with this kind of love? Then you must DO this kind of love too! If you offend someone, you should make it right, not just say, "I'm sorry" but find out what they need from you to repair the damage you have caused.
This is seen everyday in our world we live in when we file an insurance claim for an "accident'. When someone hits your car, there is a process that unfolds to repair the damage. We have insurance to cover our mistakes when driving. Well, the same thing should be true for our actions in life. When we cause a "foul" there should be an exchange, a payment, a repair to make it right.
Actions ALWAYS speak louder than words and in this case, if you apologize to someone, you also must be willing to MAKE it right by doing something. Words are cheap! What a wonderful world this would be if people would just OWN UP on what they have done. We ALL fail. We ALL need to be able to own it, address it, confess it and repair it.
Wednesday, February 6, 2013
2nd Amendment and Newtown
Bill Stevens a Newtown resident has this testimony right! Rather than re-writing his entire testimony before congress here, you need to listen to this. He is absolutely right, there is a CONSTITUTION still in America and DUE PROCESS. Legislation is NOT due process. Wake up AMERICA!
"911 will be called AFTER the security of my home is established." - Bill Stevens. He went on to say, "Charlton Heston made the phrase, 'from my cold dead hands' famous. And I will tell you here today you will take my ability to protect my Victory 'from my cold dead hands'."
'Nuf said.
"911 will be called AFTER the security of my home is established." - Bill Stevens. He went on to say, "Charlton Heston made the phrase, 'from my cold dead hands' famous. And I will tell you here today you will take my ability to protect my Victory 'from my cold dead hands'."
'Nuf said.
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
Benghazi and Accountability
So tell me again why so many defended Hilary and the president when they stood in the rose garden and blamed a video? Used to be that when leadership were caught in their lies, they resigned before bringing disgrace on our nation. Remember Watergate? How many people were fired, removed and/or resigned? Today we have four people dead in Benghazi and one is an Ambassador not to mention the two former Navy seals and yet it seems some just want to "sweep this under the rug and move forward" like nothing terrible has really happened.
"Sweeping things under the rug and moving forward" seems to be a "spell" over many these days, not only in politics but I have seen this personally in my family and even in the church. What happened to accountability? How about responsibility? Integrity? Repentance? Restitution? When we allow people/leadership to do this, we are basically saying that this "injustice" (whatever it may be) is no big deal and we hear them saying "get over it".
Really? I have seen this same demon manifesting in pastors taking this same stance over issues in their church when it comes to family disputes. They want to "sweep things under the rug". No one wants to get their "hands dirty" and so they "wash their hands" of involvement in anything "messy" so they don't loose tithes or members because too many people today are not about truth; they are about easy.
It reminds me of Meg Ryan's line in "You've Got Mail". Kathleen Kelly is dealing with the loss of her business and she keeps hearing this line as if it is truth. She is told that it is nothing personal; it's business. She finally responds with this dialog, "What is that supposed to mean? I am so sick of that. All that means is that it wasn't personal to *you*. But it was personal to me. It's *personal* to a lot of people. And what's so wrong with being personal, anyway?"
I have seen SO many things in the past few years (even aside from politics) where people act like personal attacks are nothing personal. Really? Or where accountability and leadership don't want to get involved with "this or that" because that is a "family issue" or they use the line of it's "personal".
"And what's so wrong with being personal, anyway?" - Kathleen Kelly
We seem to live in a day where accountability and restitution seem to be a thing of the past. Tragic!
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Drugs and YOUR Performance
Saw this on a social web-site and thought the information was worth sharing. Don't think drugs affect you? Think again.
"In 1995, a group of NASA scientists experimented with drugs, literally. They studied the effects that various legal and illegal drugs have on house spiders, and specifically on the way they weave their webs. The results are both surprising and... not.
The spider that was high on marijuana did a fair job weaving, but then got bored or distracted and didn't finish. The one on speed went really fast, of course, but without much awareness of the overall picture: it left large gaps. The acid-trippy spider wove a psychedelic, symmetrical web which was very pretty but not great at catching bugs.
And that brings us to caffeine. Wow. As I sit here typing, a large cup of coffee beside my laptop, I, well, I don't really want it anymore.
The NASA scientists suggested the possibility of analyzing the periodic structure of the spiderwebs (or lack thereof) as a means of determining the relative toxicity levels of drugs. They do not seem to have continued down that road, however; one obstacle may have been the difficulty of extrapolating a given drug's toxicity to humans from its toxicity to spiders. Though similarities between effects on the two species do seem to exist, I'm not sure caffeine makes me feel quite like THAT. In fact, if I wove spiderwebs, that one would probably be pre-morning-cup-of-coffee.
Such questions as what the research had to do with space shuttles or Mars rovers, where the scientists got the drugs, and what happened to the spiders later unfortunately cannot be answered here. The relevant NASA briefs are cited by other academic papers and New Scientist Magazine (www.newscientist.com/ article/mg14619750.500), but aren't themselves published on the web. The world wide one, that is.
Source: www.factodiem.com/2010/08/ this-is-your-web-on-drugs.h tml"
Interesting article, don't you think? Makes me glad the cup in front of me is decaf, thank you!
"In 1995, a group of NASA scientists experimented with drugs, literally. They studied the effects that various legal and illegal drugs have on house spiders, and specifically on the way they weave their webs. The results are both surprising and... not.
The spider that was high on marijuana did a fair job weaving, but then got bored or distracted and didn't finish. The one on speed went really fast, of course, but without much awareness of the overall picture: it left large gaps. The acid-trippy spider wove a psychedelic, symmetrical web which was very pretty but not great at catching bugs.
And that brings us to caffeine. Wow. As I sit here typing, a large cup of coffee beside my laptop, I, well, I don't really want it anymore.
The NASA scientists suggested the possibility of analyzing the periodic structure of the spiderwebs (or lack thereof) as a means of determining the relative toxicity levels of drugs. They do not seem to have continued down that road, however; one obstacle may have been the difficulty of extrapolating a given drug's toxicity to humans from its toxicity to spiders. Though similarities between effects on the two species do seem to exist, I'm not sure caffeine makes me feel quite like THAT. In fact, if I wove spiderwebs, that one would probably be pre-morning-cup-of-coffee.
Such questions as what the research had to do with space shuttles or Mars rovers, where the scientists got the drugs, and what happened to the spiders later unfortunately cannot be answered here. The relevant NASA briefs are cited by other academic papers and New Scientist Magazine (www.newscientist.com/
Source: www.factodiem.com/2010/08/
Interesting article, don't you think? Makes me glad the cup in front of me is decaf, thank you!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)